South · AR

Arkansas

Draft research · Evidence tier A

Arkansas enacted Act 1227 of 1999, an early law requiring nonvisual access to state information technology developed, procured, maintained, or used with public funds.

Initial research category: Enacted state ICT/nonvisual-access law

Structured draft values

At a glance

Each card pairs the conservative normalized value with the original research wording.

Enacted state law
Not yet verified

Research or expert verification is still required.

Original research wording

Statute — Enacted; modernization status should be evaluated.

Mandatory state policy
Not yet verified

Research or expert verification is still required.

Original research wording

Statute — Enacted; modernization status should be evaluated.

WCAG requirement
Not yet verified

Research or expert verification is still required.

Original research wording

Predates current WCAG; Section 508-era and nonvisual-access concepts.

Government websites
Unclear

Available wording cannot be reduced to one conclusion without inference.

Original research wording

Yes within statutory ICT scope

Mobile applications
Historical or outdated

The cited framework is historical, older, or potentially outdated.

Original research wording

Not explicit due to age

Electronic documents and PDFs
Not yet verified

Research or expert verification is still required.

Original research wording

Likely within information access; verify

Software, systems, and other ICT
Yes

The initial research states yes; claim-level source review is still pending.

Original research wording

Yes

Accessible procurement
Yes

The initial research states yes; claim-level source review is still pending.

Original research wording

Yes

Education accessibility
Unclear

Available wording cannot be reduced to one conclusion without inference.

Original research wording

Check scope for public education entities

Local-government relevance
Not yet verified

Research or expert verification is still required.

Original research wording

Verify statutory definition.

Funding and implementation
Not yet verified

Research or expert verification is still required.

Original research wording

No current dedicated fund verified.

Enforcement and accountability
Not yet verified

Research or expert verification is still required.

Original research wording

Rights and agency obligations exist; current complaint/remedy process requires legal review.

Authority research

Laws, policies, and standards

Primary authority named in the draft

Act 1227 of 1999 / HB 2044.

Instrument type

Statute

Current policy status wording

Enacted; modernization status should be evaluated.

Technical standard wording

Predates current WCAG; Section 508-era and nonvisual-access concepts.

Research notes

Implementation and accountability

Funding and implementation

No current dedicated fund verified.

Enforcement and accountability

Rights and agency obligations exist; current complaint/remedy process requires legal review.

Responsible entities named in the draft

Covered state agencies, technology and procurement authorities.

Named people or policy architects

Shane Broadway is identified in archival materials as the House sponsor.

Clearly labeled analysis

Strengths and research gaps

Draft Atlas analysis: notable strength

Early statutory and procurement foundation.

Unanswered questions and cautions

The law predates modern apps, WCAG 2.1/2.2, cloud services, social media, and AI.

Evidence trail

Official and supporting source leads

Reachability does not prove that a source is current, authoritative, accessible, or supports every claim in this profile.

  1. arkleg.state.ar.us/Bills/DetailResponded at last check

    Official archived bill history reviewed for Batch 1.

  2. The Phase 0 reachability check received a successful response; authority, currency, accessibility, and claim support remain unverified.