OneWebDigital Accessibility Policy Map

Map, search, and filters

Explore all 50 state research records.

Search by state name or abbreviation, then filter using the exact structured findings. The map and HTML list always use the same validated records and matching rules.

Search and exact-value filters

Find states without erasing uncertainty

Each filter matches the selected structured value exactly. For example, “not yet verified” never matches “no,” and proposed-only research never matches “yes.”

50 of 50 states match the current search and filters.

Visual map enhancement

50-state policy research map

Tiles use the draft overall category. Abbreviations and the synchronized list carry the same information without relying on color.

Interactive 50-state tile mapEach matching state is a link to its research profile. The HTML state list after the map provides the same profile links and additional comparison controls.Alabama (AL). Official statewide/agency policy; no comprehensive state ICT statute verified. Matches the current search and filters.ALAlaska (AK). Mandatory statewide ICT accessibility policy. Matches the current search and filters.AKArizona (AZ). Statewide administrative accessibility policy. Matches the current search and filters.AZArkansas (AR). Enacted state ICT/nonvisual-access law. Matches the current search and filters.ARCalifornia (CA). Enacted law plus recurring accessibility certification. Matches the current search and filters.CAColorado (CO). Enacted civil-rights law with rules and judicial enforcement. Matches the current search and filters.COConnecticut (CT). Statewide web/digital accessibility policy. Matches the current search and filters.CTDelaware (DE). Statewide digital-accessibility program/policy. Matches the current search and filters.DEFlorida (FL). Statewide Section 508-based website requirement. Matches the current search and filters.FLGeorgia (GA). Mandatory statewide digital-accessibility standard. Matches the current search and filters.GAHawaii (HI). Enacted electronic-information-technology accessibility framework. Matches the current search and filters.HIIdaho (ID). Statewide web publishing policy and standards. Matches the current search and filters.IDIllinois (IL). Enacted broad information-technology accessibility law. Matches the current search and filters.ILIndiana (IN). Enacted cross-government accessibility statute. Matches the current search and filters.INIowa (IA). State enterprise web-accessibility standard. Matches the current search and filters.IAKansas (KS). Mandatory statewide ICT accessibility standard. Matches the current search and filters.KSKentucky (KY). Enacted accessible-technology/procurement law plus older web standard. Matches the current search and filters.KYLouisiana (LA). Official accessibility policy/statement; comprehensive statewide mandate not verified. Matches the current search and filters.LAMaine (ME). State digital-accessibility policy and centralized implementation. Matches the current search and filters.MEMaryland (MD). State digital-accessibility policy plus nonvisual-access/procurement provisions. Matches the current search and filters.MDMassachusetts (MA). Mandatory enterprise IT accessibility policy. Matches the current search and filters.MAMichigan (MI). Mandatory state digital standards. Matches the current search and filters.MIMinnesota (MN). State accessibility standards and centralized Office of Accessibility. Matches the current search and filters.MNMississippi (MS). Federal-rule implementation; comprehensive state-specific framework not verified. Matches the current search and filters.MSMissouri (MO). Enacted accessible-information-technology statute. Matches the current search and filters.MOMontana (MT). State accessibility policy and active WCAG implementation. Matches the current search and filters.MTNebraska (NE). State Technology Access Policy and centralized accessibility program. Matches the current search and filters.NENevada (NV). State digital-accessibility program and CIO policy. Matches the current search and filters.NVNew Hampshire (NH). Mandatory statewide information-technology accessibility policy. Matches the current search and filters.NHNew Jersey (NJ). State web-accessibility policy, active modernization, and proposed legislation. Matches the current search and filters.NJNew Mexico (NM). Federal implementation plus major vetoed accessibility bill. Matches the current search and filters.NMNew York (NY). Longstanding statewide web policy plus modernization proposals. Matches the current search and filters.NYNorth Carolina (NC). Modern statewide digital-accessibility and usability standard. Matches the current search and filters.NCNorth Dakota (ND). Statewide WCAG standard, implementation hub, and funded remediation. Matches the current search and filters.NDOhio (OH). State Digital Accessibility Administrative Policy. Matches the current search and filters.OHOklahoma (OK). Enacted Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Law. Matches the current search and filters.OKOregon (OR). Statewide Title II implementation plus agency digital-accessibility policies. Matches the current search and filters.ORPennsylvania (PA). Commonwealth Digital Accessibility Policy. Matches the current search and filters.PARhode Island (RI). State universal-access web policy plus modernization efforts. Matches the current search and filters.RISouth Carolina (SC). Official accessibility policy and agency implementation; comprehensive state mandate unclear. Matches the current search and filters.SCSouth Dakota (SD). Online accessibility policy for state government. Matches the current search and filters.SDTennessee (TN). Statewide remediation effort plus enacted education-accessibility initiative. Matches the current search and filters.TNTexas (TX). Enacted electronic-information-resources law and detailed accessibility rules. Matches the current search and filters.TXUtah (UT). Mandatory state ICT accessibility rule and statutory WCAG requirement. Matches the current search and filters.UTVermont (VT). State web-accessibility policy and statutory digital-services authority. Matches the current search and filters.VTVirginia (VA). Enacted Information Technology Access Act and enterprise standard. Matches the current search and filters.VAWashington (WA). Mandatory statewide digital-accessibility policy and standard. Matches the current search and filters.WAWest Virginia (WV). State website accessibility policy; comprehensive modern framework not verified. Matches the current search and filters.WVWisconsin (WI). State Section 508-based web policy plus failed modernization legislation. Matches the current search and filters.WIWyoming (WY). State Web Communication Accessibility Standard. Matches the current search and filters.WY
Draft category colors
  • Dark green
  • Green
  • Light green
  • Yellow
  • Orange
  • Gray

Synchronized HTML state list

50 of 50 states match

Compare two states

  1. Alabama

    South · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: Official statewide/agency policy; no comprehensive state ICT statute verified

    Authority named in the draft: Alabama.gov accessibility policy and agency accessibility statements.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Alabama profileCompare Alabama

  2. Alaska

    West · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Mandatory statewide ICT accessibility policy

    Authority named in the draft: State of Alaska Accessibility of Information and Communication Technology Policy and Procedure.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Alaska profileCompare Alaska

  3. Arizona

    West · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: Statewide administrative accessibility policy

    Authority named in the draft: AZ.gov Accessibility Policy.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Arizona profileCompare Arizona

  4. Arkansas

    South · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Enacted state ICT/nonvisual-access law

    Authority named in the draft: Act 1227 of 1999 / HB 2044.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Arkansas profileCompare Arkansas

  5. California

    West · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Enacted law plus recurring accessibility certification

    Authority named in the draft: Government Code §§7405, 11135, and 11546.7; AB 434 certification framework.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View California profileCompare California

  6. Colorado

    West · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Enacted civil-rights law with rules and judicial enforcement

    Authority named in the draft: HB21-1110; SB23-244; 8 CCR 1501-11 Technology Accessibility Rules.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Colorado profileCompare Colorado

  7. Connecticut

    Northeast · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: Statewide web/digital accessibility policy

    Authority named in the draft: Connecticut state web/digital accessibility policy and Department of Administrative Services guidance.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Connecticut profileCompare Connecticut

  8. Delaware

    Northeast · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: Statewide digital-accessibility program/policy

    Authority named in the draft: State of Delaware digital accessibility policy/program.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Delaware profileCompare Delaware

  9. Florida

    South · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: Statewide Section 508-based website requirement

    Authority named in the draft: Florida Department of Management Services accessibility requirements and agency policies.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Florida profileCompare Florida

  10. Georgia

    South · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Mandatory statewide digital-accessibility standard

    Authority named in the draft: Georgia Digital Accessibility Standard SM-19-002 and Digital Services Georgia standards.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Georgia profileCompare Georgia

  11. Hawaii

    West · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Enacted electronic-information-technology accessibility framework

    Authority named in the draft: Act 172, Session Laws of Hawaiʻi 2022, and state EIT Disability Access Standards.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Hawaii profileCompare Hawaii

  12. Idaho

    West · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: Statewide web publishing policy and standards

    Authority named in the draft: Idaho Technology Authority Web Publishing Policy P5010, Standard S5120, and accessibility guidance.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Idaho profileCompare Idaho

  13. Illinois

    Midwest · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Enacted broad information-technology accessibility law

    Authority named in the draft: Illinois Information Technology Accessibility Act, Public Act 095-0307, and IITAA Standards.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Illinois profileCompare Illinois

  14. Indiana

    Midwest · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Enacted cross-government accessibility statute

    Authority named in the draft: Indiana Code §4-13.1-3-1 and state accessibility standards.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Indiana profileCompare Indiana

  15. Iowa

    Midwest · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: State enterprise web-accessibility standard

    Authority named in the draft: State of Iowa Enterprise Web Accessibility Standard and current technology guidance.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Iowa profileCompare Iowa

  16. Kansas

    Midwest · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Mandatory statewide ICT accessibility standard

    Authority named in the draft: Kansas Information Technology Executive Council accessibility policy/standard, including ITEC 1210-P.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Kansas profileCompare Kansas

  17. Kentucky

    South · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Enacted accessible-technology/procurement law plus older web standard

    Authority named in the draft: Kentucky accessible information-technology provisions originating in 2000 legislation; Kentucky Information Technology Standards.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Kentucky profileCompare Kentucky

  18. Louisiana

    South · Evidence tier C

    Draft overall category: Official accessibility policy/statement; comprehensive statewide mandate not verified

    Authority named in the draft: Louisiana.gov Accessibility Statement and agency practices.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Louisiana profileCompare Louisiana

  19. Maine

    Northeast · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: State digital-accessibility policy and centralized implementation

    Authority named in the draft: State of Maine Digital Accessibility Policy and MaineIT accessibility program.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Maine profileCompare Maine

  20. Maryland

    South · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: State digital-accessibility policy plus nonvisual-access/procurement provisions

    Authority named in the draft: Maryland Digital Accessibility Policy; Maryland Nonvisual Access requirements; Education Article §7-910 for digital tools.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Maryland profileCompare Maryland

  21. Massachusetts

    Northeast · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Mandatory enterprise IT accessibility policy

    Authority named in the draft: Enterprise Information Technology Accessibility Policy and associated standards.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Massachusetts profileCompare Massachusetts

  22. Michigan

    Midwest · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Mandatory state digital standards

    Authority named in the draft: State of Michigan Digital Standards and Administrative Guide accessibility policies.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Michigan profileCompare Michigan

  23. Minnesota

    Midwest · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: State accessibility standards and centralized Office of Accessibility

    Authority named in the draft: Minnesota accessibility standards and MNIT Office of Accessibility program.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Minnesota profileCompare Minnesota

  24. Mississippi

    South · Evidence tier C

    Draft overall category: Federal-rule implementation; comprehensive state-specific framework not verified

    Authority named in the draft: Mississippi ITS ADA Title II digital-accessibility implementation guidance.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Mississippi profileCompare Mississippi

  25. Missouri

    Midwest · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Enacted accessible-information-technology statute

    Authority named in the draft: RSMo. §191.863 and Missouri accessible-IT standards.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Missouri profileCompare Missouri

  26. Montana

    West · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: State accessibility policy and active WCAG implementation

    Authority named in the draft: State of Montana Accessibility Policy/assurance and SITSD accessibility program.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Montana profileCompare Montana

  27. Nebraska

    Midwest · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: State Technology Access Policy and centralized accessibility program

    Authority named in the draft: Nebraska Information Technology Commission Technology Access Policy and standards.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Nebraska profileCompare Nebraska

  28. Nevada

    West · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: State digital-accessibility program and CIO policy

    Authority named in the draft: State CIO accessibility policy/guidelines and Governor’s Technology Office Digital Accessibility Program.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Nevada profileCompare Nevada

  29. New Hampshire

    Northeast · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Mandatory statewide information-technology accessibility policy

    Authority named in the draft: Policy NHS0305, Information Technology Accessibility, Version 4, effective June 25, 2024.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View New Hampshire profileCompare New Hampshire

  30. New Jersey

    Northeast · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: State web-accessibility policy, active modernization, and proposed legislation

    Authority named in the draft: NJOIT web-accessibility policy and New Jersey Web Presence Hub accessibility guidance.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View New Jersey profileCompare New Jersey

  31. New Mexico

    West · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: Federal implementation plus major vetoed accessibility bill

    Authority named in the draft: Agency accessibility programs and HB120 legislative record.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View New Mexico profileCompare New Mexico

  32. New York

    Northeast · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: Longstanding statewide web policy plus modernization proposals

    Authority named in the draft: New York State Office of Information Technology Services accessibility policy/standards.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View New York profileCompare New York

  33. North Carolina

    South · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Modern statewide digital-accessibility and usability standard

    Authority named in the draft: North Carolina Digital Accessibility and Usability Standard.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View North Carolina profileCompare North Carolina

  34. North Dakota

    Midwest · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Statewide WCAG standard, implementation hub, and funded remediation

    Authority named in the draft: North Dakota IT Accessibility Standard and Digital Accessibility Hub.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View North Dakota profileCompare North Dakota

  35. Ohio

    Midwest · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: State Digital Accessibility Administrative Policy

    Authority named in the draft: Ohio Administrative Policy IT-09, Digital Accessibility.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Ohio profileCompare Ohio

  36. Oklahoma

    South · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Enacted Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Law

    Authority named in the draft: Oklahoma EITA law, originally HB2197; current Title 62 §§34.28–34.30.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Oklahoma profileCompare Oklahoma

  37. Oregon

    West · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: Statewide Title II implementation plus agency digital-accessibility policies

    Authority named in the draft: Enterprise Information Services accessibility guidance and agency policies such as OHA/ODHS digital-accessibility policies.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Oregon profileCompare Oregon

  38. Pennsylvania

    Northeast · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Commonwealth Digital Accessibility Policy

    Authority named in the draft: Digital Accessibility Policy ITP-ACC001 and Commonwealth accessibility policy.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Pennsylvania profileCompare Pennsylvania

  39. Rhode Island

    Northeast · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: State universal-access web policy plus modernization efforts

    Authority named in the draft: RI.gov Universal Access/Accessibility Policy and enterprise technology strategy.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Rhode Island profileCompare Rhode Island

  40. South Carolina

    South · Evidence tier C

    Draft overall category: Official accessibility policy and agency implementation; comprehensive state mandate unclear

    Authority named in the draft: SC.gov Accessibility Policy and agency digital-accessibility policies.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View South Carolina profileCompare South Carolina

  41. South Dakota

    Midwest · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: Online accessibility policy for state government

    Authority named in the draft: Bureau of Information and Telecommunications Online Accessibility Policy for State Government.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View South Dakota profileCompare South Dakota

  42. Tennessee

    South · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: Statewide remediation effort plus enacted education-accessibility initiative

    Authority named in the draft: State web-accessibility policy/implementation; SB1692/HB1857, Public Chapter 712 (2014), on accessible digital curricula.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Tennessee profileCompare Tennessee

  43. Texas

    South · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Enacted electronic-information-resources law and detailed accessibility rules

    Authority named in the draft: Texas Government Code Chapter 2054, Subchapter M; 1 TAC Chapters 206 and 213.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Texas profileCompare Texas

  44. Utah

    West · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Mandatory state ICT accessibility rule and statutory WCAG requirement

    Authority named in the draft: Utah Administrative Rule R895-14 and related state statutory/digital-experience requirements.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Utah profileCompare Utah

  45. Vermont

    Northeast · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: State web-accessibility policy and statutory digital-services authority

    Authority named in the draft: Agency of Digital Services Web Accessibility Policy and 3 V.S.A. Chapter 56.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Vermont profileCompare Vermont

  46. Virginia

    South · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Enacted Information Technology Access Act and enterprise standard

    Authority named in the draft: Virginia Information Technology Access Act; HB2541 (2025); VITA ITRM Standard GOV103.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Virginia profileCompare Virginia

  47. Washington

    West · Evidence tier A

    Draft overall category: Mandatory statewide digital-accessibility policy and standard

    Authority named in the draft: Washington State Digital Accessibility Policy and Digital Accessibility Standard.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Washington profileCompare Washington

  48. West Virginia

    South · Evidence tier C

    Draft overall category: State website accessibility policy; comprehensive modern framework not verified

    Authority named in the draft: WV.gov Accessibility Policy and legislative accessibility procedures.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View West Virginia profileCompare West Virginia

  49. Wisconsin

    Midwest · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: State Section 508-based web policy plus failed modernization legislation

    Authority named in the draft: Wisconsin.gov Accessibility Policy; AB904 legislative record.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Wisconsin profileCompare Wisconsin

  50. Wyoming

    West · Evidence tier B

    Draft overall category: State Web Communication Accessibility Standard

    Authority named in the draft: Wyoming Administration & Information Web Communication Accessibility Standard.

    Last verified in draft: July 18, 2026

    View Wyoming profileCompare Wyoming