Northeast · MA

Massachusetts

Draft research · Evidence tier A

Massachusetts requires agencies to ensure that IT solutions and content are accessible to employees and the public, including technology acquired from third parties.

Initial research category: Mandatory enterprise IT accessibility policy

Structured draft values

At a glance

Each card pairs the conservative normalized value with the original research wording.

Enacted state law
Not yet verified

Research or expert verification is still required.

Original research wording

Mandatory enterprise policy — Active.

Mandatory state policy
Not yet verified

Research or expert verification is still required.

Original research wording

Mandatory enterprise policy — Active.

WCAG requirement
Not yet verified

Research or expert verification is still required.

Original research wording

WCAG and Section 508-based enterprise standards; verify exact current version in the authoritative standard.

Government websites
Yes

The initial research states yes; claim-level source review is still pending.

Original research wording

Yes

Mobile applications
Unclear

Available wording cannot be reduced to one conclusion without inference.

Original research wording

Broad IT solutions/federal coverage

Electronic documents and PDFs
Yes

The initial research states yes; claim-level source review is still pending.

Original research wording

Yes

Software, systems, and other ICT
Yes

The initial research states yes; claim-level source review is still pending.

Original research wording

Yes

Accessible procurement
Unclear

Available wording cannot be reduced to one conclusion without inference.

Original research wording

Yes, including third-party solutions

Education accessibility
Not yet verified

Research or expert verification is still required.

Original research wording

Verify institution-specific scope

Local-government relevance
Federal requirement only

Only the separate federal baseline is explicit in the initial research.

Original research wording

Federal Title II applies.

Funding and implementation
Unclear

Available wording cannot be reduced to one conclusion without inference.

Original research wording

Agency/enterprise implementation.

Enforcement and accountability
Not yet verified

Research or expert verification is still required.

Original research wording

Enterprise policy compliance, procurement review, and ADA processes.

Authority research

Laws, policies, and standards

Primary authority named in the draft

Enterprise Information Technology Accessibility Policy and associated standards.

Instrument type

Mandatory enterprise policy

Current policy status wording

Active.

Technical standard wording

WCAG and Section 508-based enterprise standards; verify exact current version in the authoritative standard.

Research notes

Implementation and accountability

Funding and implementation

Agency/enterprise implementation.

Enforcement and accountability

Enterprise policy compliance, procurement review, and ADA processes.

Responsible entities named in the draft

Executive Office of Technology Services and Security and agencies.

Named people or policy architects

Administrative policy; no single legislator required.

Clearly labeled analysis

Strengths and research gaps

Draft Atlas analysis: notable strength

Broad IT-solution scope, employees and public, and third-party procurement.

Unanswered questions and cautions

Public audit dashboards, exception transparency, and exact state-wide coverage outside executive agencies.

Evidence trail

Official and supporting source leads

Reachability does not prove that a source is current, authoritative, accessible, or supports every claim in this profile.

  1. Automated retrieval returned HTTP 403 on 2026-07-19. The exact historical URL is retained; a separately sourced Enterprise Digital Accessibility Policy was published in 2025.

  2. The Phase 0 reachability check received a successful response; authority, currency, accessibility, and claim support remain unverified.