Midwest · WI
Wisconsin
Draft research · Evidence tier B
Wisconsin has a state web-accessibility policy based on Section 508, while bipartisan AB904 proposed broader statewide IT accessibility standards but failed in the 2023–24 session.
Initial research category: State Section 508-based web policy plus failed modernization legislation
Structured draft values
At a glance
Each card pairs the conservative normalized value with the original research wording.
- Enacted state law
- Not yet verified
Research or expert verification is still required.
Original research wordingAdministrative web policy plus failed legislation — Policy active; AB904 failed.
- Mandatory state policy
- Not yet verified
Research or expert verification is still required.
Original research wordingAdministrative web policy plus failed legislation — Policy active; AB904 failed.
- WCAG requirement
- Not yet verified
Research or expert verification is still required.
Original research wordingState policy is Section 508-based; agencies are implementing WCAG 2.1 AA under federal Title II.
- Government websites
- Yes
The initial research states yes; claim-level source review is still pending.
Original research wordingYes
- Mobile applications
- Federal requirement only
Only the separate federal baseline is explicit in the initial research.
Original research wordingFederal implementation; state-policy clarity limited
- Electronic documents and PDFs
- Partial
The initial research describes partial coverage or authority.
Original research wordingPartial
- Software, systems, and other ICT
- Proposed only
The described provision appears only in proposed, failed, or vetoed legislation.
Original research wordingAB904 proposed broader standards
- Accessible procurement
- Proposed only
The described provision appears only in proposed, failed, or vetoed legislation.
Original research wordingAB904/proposed scope; current statewide requirement needs verification
- Education accessibility
- Unclear
Available wording cannot be reduced to one conclusion without inference.
Original research wordingInstitution-specific
- Local-government relevance
- Federal requirement only
Only the separate federal baseline is explicit in the initial research.
Original research wordingFederal Title II applies.
- Funding and implementation
- Not yet verified
Research or expert verification is still required.
Original research wordingNot verified.
- Enforcement and accountability
- Not yet verified
Research or expert verification is still required.
Original research wordingAgency/federal processes; failed bill did not create new remedies.
Authority research
Laws, policies, and standards
Primary authority named in the draft
Wisconsin.gov Accessibility Policy; AB904 legislative record.
Instrument type
Administrative web policy plus failed legislation
Current policy status wording
Policy active; AB904 failed.
Technical standard wording
State policy is Section 508-based; agencies are implementing WCAG 2.1 AA under federal Title II.
Separately tracked legislative instruments
These records are isolated so proposed, failed, or vetoed provisions cannot be presented as enacted authority.
- AB904 (2023-24)Status: failed
The draft explicitly identifies AB904 as failed in the 2023-24 session.
Research notes
Implementation and accountability
Funding and implementation
Not verified.
Enforcement and accountability
Agency/federal processes; failed bill did not create new remedies.
Responsible entities named in the draft
State digital teams and agencies.
Named people or policy architects
Former/then-Rep. Jimmy Anderson was first-listed sponsor of AB904, with bipartisan co-sponsors including David Steffen, Bob Donovan, Jerry O’Connor, Chuck Wichgers, Julian Bradley, and Robert Cowles.
Clearly labeled analysis
Strengths and research gaps
Draft Atlas analysis: notable strength
Existing policy and bipartisan recognition that broader standards are needed.
Unanswered questions and cautions
Modern binding statewide scope, apps, procurement, funding, audits, and enforcement.
Evidence trail
Official and supporting source leads
Reachability does not prove that a source is current, authoritative, accessible, or supports every claim in this profile.
- legiscan.com/WI/bill/AB904/2023Automated check restricted
Automated checks received HTTP 403 or 429; a human browser check is still required.
- wisconsin.gov/Pages/Policies.aspxResponded at last check
Official current Wisconsin.gov policy page reviewed for its website and web-application accessibility requirements.